"History's verdict is all we have left.  And when tomorrow calls today into account, some of us want to say we stood up.  We called out.  We were not silent."
--Leonard Pitts, Jr., "Gestures of Conscience Bring Solace," Baltimore Sun, March 19, 2006

A MUST-SEE MOVIE TO WATCH, TIVO, OR DVR TONIGHT

Print the article

This entry was posted on 2/21/2009 1:05 PM and is filed under uncategorized.

Tonight, Saturday, February 21, on HBO, the movie Taking Chance airs at 8 p.m. or 7 p.m. central time.

Taking Chance is a true story, starring Kevin Bacon, and is based on a journal kept by  Lt. Col. Michael Strobl, a Desert Storm veteran who in 2004 was asked to be assigned for military escort duty to accompany the remains of Lance Cpl. Chance Phelps to his family in Dubois, Wyo.

You can see a trailer for the movie here.

I vividly remember the death of this young man, not because it stood out with any more fanfare than the deaths of the other 4,245 who have died in Iraq so far, but because of the moving homecoming ceremony that took place in the small western cowboy town where he was laid to rest. 

I remember, for example, that his casket was driven to the cemetary in a horse-drawn wagon, in true cowboy fashion.

But this movie is not about one Marine, fallen in battle.  As Tom Shales so beautifully pointed out in his review in the Washington Post today, it is about HONOR:


Rendering honor is one of the film's themes, and also one of its singular accomplishments...

The filmmakers show us in striking detail many of the little rituals that are part of the larger procedure, from the gentle cleansing of the dead man's fingers and toes (his face and most battle scars are avoided) to the fastening of a creepy bar-code tag to the black body bag.

That's one of the few cold, bureaucratic acts. For the most part, as the film makes clear, remarkable care is shown and taken by those who come in contact with the remains at each stage of the journey -- loading the long box onto one plane or another, carrying it in a hearse, carefully placing a memento inside the coffin and even, in an unusual gesture, declining the offer of a hotel room so he can sleep near the coffin inside a cargo hangar at a stopover.

At each stop, whenever the box is transferred from one conveyance to another, Strobl salutes -- a smart but slow salute, held until the box passes by. Sometimes onlookers or passersby feel compelled to register their own respect in some similar sort of gesture. At one point, as the remains are being transported in a long back limousine down a narrow Western highway, the cars behind form an impromptu cortege, headlights on as another sign of respect.

One could argue that such actions ring hollow, even meaningless. They are, indeed, inadequate to the occasion. But one does what one can; it's the motivation behind the effort, rather than the effort itself, that is moving and later haunting.


Now, I know what you are thinking.

You're thinking, BUT THAT'S SO DEPRESSING!!  Why would I want to watch such a sad movie?

I know you're thinking that because I confess I had the same thoughts.  As a Marine combat mom, I've done my best to avoid some of the more maudlin stories that go around about the war-dead.  For one thing, many of them skirt a very fine line between honoring the fallen and glorifying war.

And for another, most of these stories hit just a bit too close to home.  Having written a condolence letter to the mother of one of my son's buddies, and gotten a response from her, I can tell you that there is nothing glorious about grief.

But this movie is different.

It's about REMEMBERING.

Most people remain oblivious that flag-draped caskets are still coming home to the U.S. from Iraq with depressing frequency, a sad fact that gets completely overlooked in all the humid hothouse cable-news coverage of a new presidential administration and various domestic problems facing his team.

Even now, President Obama has requested a review of the policy that bans cameras from Dover Air Force Base, where all these caskets arrive with depressing frquency.  Until that policy is lifted though--a policy but in by Dick Cheney when he was secretary of defense in the first Gulf War--people tend to forget.

People forget.

This movie is an extraordinary testament, not just to the care and respect given to those flag-draped caskets, but the heroism of the family members and the military escorts (every single Marine gets escorted home by a fellow Marine, who remains with the family and tends to their needs for at least a couple of weeks, through the funeral and all the bureaucratic necessities that follow), and by the dignity afforded by even the most casual spectators, who may not have even known who lies in that casket.

Shales writes:

"He'd be so happy" that an officer "brought him home," one of Phelps's relatives tells Srobl at a memorial service. When Strobl briefly expresses regret that his role of "escort" feels hollow and meaningless to him, a Korean War vet reprimands him. "Without a witness," he tells Strobl, Phelps would just "disappear."

Attention must indeed be paid, as Arthur Miller wrote of quite a different character, and respect must be shown. "Taking Chance" gives us all the opportunity to render honor.


Just before my son was due to deploy to Iraq, his unit specially trained to take part in the upcoming crucial Battle of Fallujah, in November of '04, ABC news correspondent Ted Koppell took a step which, at the time, was wildly controversial:  On his late-night news program, Nightline, he called out the names of all 1,000 men and women who had died up to that point in Iraq, and he showed photographs of each and every one.

I remain stunned with disbelief that anyone, anywhere, could possibly accuse the honoring of the war dead as being some kind of political or anti-war statement.

IT IS HONOR, period.

Alone in my living room, I stood at attention before the television set, and I studied each face that appeared on screen and listened to each name, my vision blurred with tears.

It was my way of honoring their lives--not just their deaths.  THEY EXISTED.

At the same time, I was utterly, completely terrified.

But I believed that to turn away, to pretend that men and women were not giving their lives even at that moment, was the true dishonor.

From what I understand in reading various interviews, this movie is not "depressing."  It is uplifting, if for no other reason than to remind each and every one of us that we owe a responsibility to those who stepped up and gave what Lincoln called "the full measure of devotion" for their country.

What is that responsibility?

That we remember.

I urge you to watch this fine program, or TIVO, or DVR it.  Don't miss it.  Don't turn away from it.

Let us all remember, and honor.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 2/21/2009 3:12 PM Susan wrote:
      There is a stretch of a highway here in Canada between the airport in Toronto where bodies of soldiers arrive and their home base in Trenton, Ontario. Everytime a body of a soldier comes home, people gather on all of the overpass bridges to honour them. They salute or wave flags or they stand silently as the casket passes by.
      The caskets returning home are shown on TV here without dire consequences, it simply allows us to pause and acknowledge the sacrifice of the young men or women and it reminds us of the terrible cost of war.
      Reply to this
      1. 2/21/2009 4:24 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        You are absolutely right, Susan.

        The Bush admin SAID they were protecting the families, but that is bullshit.  Most families not only do not mind, but prefer that the war-dead be honored.

        Here is the REAL reason that decision was made.  Back in 1991, the first Bush was giving a speech that was being televised live on CNN.  He cracked a bad joke and laughed at it.  Meanwhile, bodies in caskets from the first Gulf War happened to arrive during the speech, and CNN split the screen.  It showed Bush the First cracking a bad joke while flag-draped caskets were being unloaded from airplanes at Dover.

        Enraged, Bush and Cheney banned media coverage from then on.  Clinton had no real reason to lift the ban, and when Bush the Second started his war, they kept it in place because planes were unloading dozens of bodies every day and that put the lie to the lies they were telling about how wonderful everything was going.

        However, twice the lifted the ban, when they wanted to make a political statement of their own, then promptly lowered it.

        Sec. of Defense Bill Gates seems to be leaning toward lifting the ban, and I believe Obama is giving it serious consideration, and I hope they do.  People in our country were told for far too long to go shopping while our men and women were dying over seas.  It's time they remembered.
        Reply to this
        1. 2/21/2009 6:27 PM Susan wrote:
          I had no idea that was why they decided to ban the media coverage, what a disgrace! I do hope Obama and Gates end the ban, coverage can often lighten your heart when you see how just everyday people honour the soldiers who have given their young lives. That stretch of highway here is called the Highway of Heroes and it makes me weepy and proud everytime they show it.
          I will take your advice and watch HBO tonight.
          Reply to this
    • 2/22/2009 11:50 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
      This was sent to me by e-mail from my friend, Barry:

      Sigh, I don’t have HBO. However, you should know that even though my father died over 20 years after his tour in the Army Air Corps during WWII he is buried in Baltimore National Cemetery. His casket was draped with a flag at his request. He did not want a full military funeral out of respect for my mother’s feelings if he passed before her. He knew how hard that would be on her. In the end, though when we arrived at the cemetery there was a full military funeral in progress at the same time. My mother and all of us had to endure the haunting notes of “Taps” and the reports of a 21-gun salute. For years, his flag neatly folded rested in my mother’s hope chest. When my wife decided to make use of that hundred-year-old chest, she did one of the most loving things she’s ever done, short of bearing our children. She had my fathers flag placed in a display case that hangs in our foyer. It still stirs emotions every time I dust it.
      Reply to this
    • 2/22/2009 11:56 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
      From Barry's brother:

      When an entire class of people in our society participate in an enterprise with such far reaching consequence for the rest of the country, it is best that the other bear witness to that action. As we stare over the brink of another great depression, we know that men who professed to be honorable and to be acting in our best interest took outlandish risks while we turned our eyes away. We were told to avert our eyes from the process of making sausage. As that class upped the ante on their private gambles, capital that had been provided in trust was put at unreasonable risk. Their sense of estrangement, expressed itself in gated communities and the velvet rope. Their feeling of entitlement are reflected in the obscene bonus system that was not challenged by stock holders. Imagine the forces at work on the men, women and families, who are bearing the burden of our military adventurism.



      The dynamics of an effective military exert far more radical bifurcating effect on that class of people, whom we have allowed to take risk and bear burdens of the most existential nature. It is one thing to be “all in” in a financial equivalent of Texas Hold-em, and quite another to have what Lincoln termed “their last full measure” at stake, or worse yet, already lost. In an enterprise where the metaphor of sausage making is tragically and disgustingly far more apt, it is imperative that we the people not avert our gaze. The obligation to bear witness rest upon the entire populous regardless of how honorable or despicable the current adventure might be judged. Failure to internalize the searing investment of our citizen soldier and their families will surely result in an estrangement of that group from the county in general. My son’s reached manhood with no threat of the draft or military service of any sort. My neighbors son was sent to Iraq. It is entirely possible that in the depths their psyche my friend and his son feels at least a little more invested in their county that I am. Failure to adequately recognize the power of this perception and the consequences that flow from it, are ignored only at great peril.



      How long can one ask a soldier to continue to defend a populous who’s reactions to their service speak of ambivalence, disinterest, or disgust. Is the real danger that those who continue to serve in those circumstances begin to lose sight of the nobility of their cause, not so much through their own action but through the manifest baseness of the world in which the fight and die and in the country to which they return? If we expect our military to behave with honor, they must be honored. This is axiomatic. We have loosed a terrible swift sword. This tool will cut wherever and whenever it is directed. Each of us, alone and collectively, through our witness, must exert the will of the brain and the loyalty of the heart of the body politic in who’s name and in who’s service this sword is deployed.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.