"History's verdict is all we have left.  And when tomorrow calls today into account, some of us want to say we stood up.  We called out.  We were not silent."
--Leonard Pitts, Jr., "Gestures of Conscience Bring Solace," Baltimore Sun, March 19, 2006

THE SECRET LIFE OF WHITE-WING CONSERVATIVES

Print the article

This entry was posted on 7/16/2010 3:00 PM and is filed under uncategorized.

If I didn't already know about the Secret Life of the White-Wing Conservatives, I would believe the recent self-righteous outrage coming out of the Tea Party in response to the NAACP challenge that they call out the racists in their midst.

Oh! My gosh! They've been so upset!  WE'RE NOT RACIST!  WE ARE GOD-FEARING PATRIOTS MERELY WORKING FOR LOWER TAXES AND SMALLER GOVERNMENT.  YOU'RE THE RACIST!!!

The thing is, I'm sure that many of these people actually believe that.  It explains the self-righteous outrage.  Not ME!  I'M no racist!

They think that is true because, once upon a time years ago, they had a black maid they were really fond of.  Or, when they were in the military, they served alongside people of color and got along just fine. 

They don't, however, have any black or Hispanic friends right NOW, just, you know, FRIENDS.  People to hang out with, invite over to their homes, send e-mail jokes and inspirational prayer-chains and patriotic flag-waving links to. 

There may be black people who attend their Mega-Church--the one with the ampitheater that seats thousands--but they don't really know them all that well.  Still, they DO go to church with black people!  And there are Hispanics there, too, like the mayor, Ms. Rodriguez.  She seems very nice.  Her kids go to the same school as their kids, but that's about it.  Or they work with a black guy...what's his name?  The one over in Marketing...

Or, they've got a cousin with a black boyfriend, and he came to the last family reunion.  They didn't speak to him though.  Not deliberate!  Just busy with other people there, and the couple left early, is all.  Besides, he seemed kind of shy.  Sat off by himself.  Would have been weird to just walk up to him and start talking, right?

Yeah, right.

See, I was going to write the kind of blogpost I normally write, chock-full of links--Oh Lord there are so many links--to prove my points: one, two, three.  You could read for yourself the racist blogposts and see for yourself the videos of the rallies and peruse Sarah Palin's ghost-written Facebook screed scolding the NAACP for "divisive politics"--which is REALLY rich.

But I've changed my mind.  I'm just going to speak from the heart here, because I've done all those things before, and on this topic.

It's not the loud, public attention-getters that gives them away--it's their Secret Life.

I'm talking about the viral e-mails.

Unlike most progressives and liberals that I know, I live in an extremely conservative area, and just about everybody I know, including many members of my own family, are very conservative.

There's nothing wrong with that.  Conservatism has a long and distinguished history in our nation's tapestry, but unfortunately, its good name got hijacked by venal win-at-all-costs politicians and their paid hacks back during the Clinton years: Tom DeLay, Newt Gingrich, Karl Rove, and others on the far right, aided and abetted by Whores of Babylon like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly, and others who perverted the conservative doctrine and twisted it into something ugly and unrecognizable, running off any and all liberal or moderate conservative voices in congress and the Senate as Republican in Name Only and forcing the survivors to go against their own principles if they wanted to stay in the Party--while, at the same time, recruiting and funding some of the most  unsuitable candidates for office imaginable, just because they were suitably crazy.  Their standard-bearer, George W. Bush, sold his soul to the devil of getting and keeping power, and proceeded to ransack the government and leave it a shambles, while provoking some of the most bitter, partisan hatreds we've seen in nearly a century.

Motivated by Clinton-hatred, egged on by warmongering faux-patriotic fever, good people who should have known better found themselves slipping down the slope--abandoning their own common-sense views and gradually embracing more and more extremist rhetoric as "truth," because by this time, they'd been brainwashed into believing the "liberal media" wasn't TELLING the truth and only the Cult of the Crazy could be trusted for this precious inside information.

Fox News came along with its 24/7 megaphone, and before you could say, "HOODWINK" or "BAMBOOZLE" the so-called mainstream media was defending them as a legitimate journalistic organization in spite of the fact that its own commentators were either blatantly running for office on the GOP ticket--and using the Fox platform to raise funds--or raising funds for their own Political Action Committees on Fox--or serving openly as lobbyists and advisors for GOP candidates and raising funds--something NO LEGITIMATE NEWS ORGANIZATION HAS EVER DONE.

(This doesn't even touch blatant conflict-of-interest situations in which on-air personalities hype fear and paranoia about the U.S. dollar and push people to invest in gold while, at the same time, advertising for gold investment companies, thus making themselves filthy rich off the terror they, themselves, have fanned, as Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly both routinely do.)

The explosion of the Internet and social-networking sites like Facebook provided an even more narrow forum for both sides of the debate, really, but studies have shown that liberals DO read a variety of news sources, but conservatives nearly always stick only to friendly sites that reinforce and validate the opinions they have already formed.  (I could provide a link to those studies but not today.)

Even when Glenn Beck himself cheerfully points out, as he did on the popular daytime program, "The View," that he is an ENTERTAINER and NOT a JOURNALIST, and even when he admitted--with no remorse--that HE NEVER FACT-CHECKS THE THINGS HE SAYS ON HIS PROGRAM--many right-wingers continue to cling to his program as "proof" of the convoluted theories he, himself, has been proposing.

And then along came a black president.

Barack Obama really did not want to run as the "first black president."  He wanted to be the president of--as he so eloquently pointed out at the Democratic convention speech of 2004, "not the Red States of America, not the Blue States of America--but the UNITED States of America!"

Nobody in the mainstream media or the right wing took him seriously for a very long time, until he started winning; and then, it looked as if he might actually WIN this thing and become President of the United States.

I'm not going to go into the public things we all already know about--the massive overkill on Jeremiah Wright and so forth.

It's the viral e-mails I want to talk about--the ones they send to EACH OTHER that don't make the evening news.

The first real, longtime, dear friend whom I loved that I cut out of my life because of these viral e-mails had been sending me one nasty hateful myth-driven viral e-mail after another that I tried to ignore, most of the time.

Then he sent me the caricature.

Barack Obama, drawn hideously out of proportion...with the big lips made so sadly famous in other racist caricatures from the Jim Crow days.

He sent me that e-mail knowing full well that I was a precinct chairman for the Obama for America campaign.  He knew I was a Democrat.  He knew I was a strong Obama supporter, working very hard for his nomination.

And yet, somehow, he seemed to think it was okay to send me that cartoon.

WHY?

What would have made an old friend--a cop I'd known for 20 years or more, who had helped me research at least one of my books, who I had long adored and with whom I had laughed so many times I can't count them--send me such a thing, knowing how I felt about the man?

I knew that, like many old-school cops, now retired, he had been prejudiced on the job--I'll be honest about that.  Many of his generation had been, and they had been terribly sexist, too.  I can't count the stupid sexist jokes he'd sent me through the years that I really didn't find all that funny but tolerated because I thought he was a good guy, overall.

But this cartoon, it was really, really MEAN.

And it revealed something so ugly, so hidden beneath the surface, about my friend that I knew I could no longer BE friends with him.

I told him the caricature was racist and bigoted and not to send me anything like that again.  When he sent me an angry diatribe in response, I deleted it without reply, removed him from my address book, and cut him out of my life for good.  I cannot be "friends" with someone whose soul has such a rottenness in it.

And you want to know the real irony?  This same guy was ALWAYS sending me the most syrupy, saccharine Jesus pictures and prayers and sentimental Sunday School stories.

He truly did not see the irony in it.  That a man calling himself a Christian could have such hate in his soul.

There have been more. 

Just a few weeks ago, there was the "joke."  Only, I didn't realize what it was.  The subject heading said, "It Had to Happen Eventually."

Open the e-mail.  Inside: A photo-shopped photograph of Joe Biden.  In cornrows.

HA HA HA HA!!!  Right???  Really funny.

I deleted it without comment.

But some of them, they don't dare send to ME, but they send to people who send them to me.  Like the one from a couple of weeks ago with the subject heading: "The First Tar-Balls Wash Up on Gulf Shores."

Open the e-mail.  A photo of Barack Obama, body-surfing.

HA HA HA HA!!!  Right???  Really funny.

Only it's not.

You know why?

Because I DO have friends of color, and the thing is, when you actually have people in your life who you love who are people of color, you don't find these kinds of things funny AT ALL because you know that they are HURTFUL. 

THEY HURT PEOPLE.  THEY HURT PEOPLE I CARE ABOUT.

It's more than just jokes, though.  When you point out that a joke is racist, the one who sent it seems truly baffled. 

Why, they just thought it was funny, that's all. Harmless.  You liberals get so upset about the silliest things.

But it's not just the jokes.

They send me other viral e-mails.  These e-mails accuse the president of the most horrific things.  And RIDICULOUS things--like the one where the president and first lady were supposedly on the White House lawn at a state ceremony, and yet when the flag passed by, they BOTH PUT THEIR LEFT HANDS OVER THEIR CHESTS!!!

"Explain this!" they demand, certain that it proves that the Obamas HATE THIS COUNTRY SO MUCH THAT THEY WOULD DELIBERATELY DISRESPECT IT BEFORE THE FLAG (and, apparently, also in front of the official White House photographer on the grounds of the White House at an official ceremony.)

Snopes.com:  The photo has been "flipped."  Check out the Marine in the background--all his ribbons are on the wrong side of his chest--this is proof that this picture has been photo-shopped, says Snopes.  (Check it out yourself.  I could provide the link, but not today.)

Again and again they send me things.  Again and again I check them out.  I can't tell you how many times the explanation is that a CONSERVATIVE BLOGGER WROTE THE PIECE AS SATIRE AND SOMEHOW IT GOT PICKED UP INTO THE BODY OF AN E-MAIL AND SENT ON ITS ROUNDS.

The fact that they believe--LITERALLY--something that The Onion might publish as a joke or Jon Stewart put on The Daily Show if it were about, say, George W. Bush or John Boehner, is not what I'm talking about, here.

What I'm talking about is that they BELIEVE IT AT ALL.

There is a segment of the population that is perfectly willing to believe the most horrible things about this president--and yes, they believed horrible things about the Clintons, too, I'll give you that--but there is a difference here and it's in the jokes.

It's in the caricatures.  The Obama-as-witch-doctor.  The Obama-as-Curious-George.  The Obama-as-Gorilla.  The Obama-With-the-Full-Lips.

When I try to refute the e-mail--especially when it maintains that Obama hates the troops, hates the military, wants veterans to pay for their own medical care or some other nonsense, I get one of two reactions:  Either they seize on some side issue that is basically unrelated to the subject at hand and start hammering me on that (one man, when we were arguing about health care reform, suddenly demanded that I explain "Obama's policy toward Palestinians!!!")  Or, they don't reply at all, which means that I have simply proven them wrong and they refuse to admit it.

I have a couple of conservative friends who will tell me the truth, and when I ask them, "Why do right-wingers, and Tea Partiers especially, hate Obama so much?"

I point out that, yes, we hated George W. Bush with a passion, especially when he lied this country into a war that cost 4,000 lives.  But WE NEVER SENT AROUND JOKES COMPARING LAURA BUSH TO A GORILLA.  We NEVER WENT ON TALK RADIO AND MADE FUN OF HIS CHILDREN.  In eight years, there was one conspiracy theory--the 9/11 plot--NOT A NEW ONE EVERY WEEK. 

In other words, we didn't have to make stuff up and we didn't send around these horrible viral e-mails to each other.  I was there.  I hated Bush because my family went to fight in a war I opposed. 

But in all that time, no liberal friend EVER sent me the kinds of things I've been sent about Barack Obama.

And my conservative friends, the ones who will admit the truth, say, "As much as I hate to admit this, and I really really hate to admit this, the truth is, it's race.  It has GOT to be race.  This is why I no longer listen to talk radio," they'll say, "or why I no longer visit so-and-so's website."

They can't take it anymore, these members of the Republican Party who find this latest development alarming.

You see, not all conservatives are racist.

And, I expect, not all Tea Partiers are racist either.  We all know they've got a few token blacks in their movement.

BUT.

IF YOU ARE NOT A RACIST, AND YOU KNOW GOOD AND DAMN WELL THAT RACISM EXISTS IN YOUR MOVEMENT, THEN WHY DON'T YOU STEP UP AND CALL IT OUT???

Instead, they rear up on their hind legs and claim that it's the BLACKS that are racist, not THEM.  They claim that the only people bringing those ugly signs WERE SENT THERE BY LIBERALS TO EMBARRASS THEM.  They claim that, to call them racist IS TO IMPUGN FREEDOM-LOVING PATRIOTS EVERYWHERE.

This is what they say publicly.

Privately?

They send around another Obama-tar-ball joke, only, they're careful not to send it to the liberals, because, hey, it's not "politically correct."

Is that what they're calling it, these days?

Me, I call it racism.

Because, the bottom line for all of you out there who have sent me those jokes: WOULD YOU SEND THEM TO A BLACK FRIEND or MEMBER OF THE FAMILY (by marriage, obviously)?

If not, why not?  Do you fear that person might be OFFENDED by that funny joke?

Oh?  And why is THAT?

Of course, this might be a difficult exercise if you don't actually HAVE any black or Hispanic friends--not acquaintances, mind you, but people you really, genuinely, care about.  People whose feelings you would never want to hurt.

And, if you don't have friends like that who happen to be black or brown or even gay...why is THAT?

Go ahead.  Think about it a while.  I can wait.



 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 7/17/2010 6:52 AM Susan wrote:
      Once again, Deanie you have excelled in writing what many of us are not eloquent enough to do but wish we could. If each of us deny racist remarks, emails, etc. on any level, perhaps we can make a difference overall and will certainly make a difference in our own lives. Living by standards we can be proud of will perhaps inspire one or two or more and so on. Thank you for this heartfelt blog post!
      Reply to this
      1. 7/17/2010 7:50 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Thank you so much, because I gotta tell ya, this was not easy to write.  People I love could read it and find it offensive and be very angry with me for saying some of the things I've said.  But if we do not speak out in our own individual lives--especially as whites--if we do not speak out, then WHO WILL?  Obviously, when the black community speaks out on this issue, they get accused of reverse-racism.  So we have to speak out.  I'm just trying to get people to think.  Sometimes you have to provoke in order to do that.  But I don't do it easily or gladly.  It's a tough issue I wish we didn't even have to discuss--as President Obama has said repeatedly.
        Reply to this
    • 7/18/2010 1:38 AM Eli wrote:
      Wow. Unbelievable. I've seen the signs here and there, but I have no real crazy conservative friends so I'm not really in the loop. (I can't even stand to turn on FOX or AM radio for a second.) Although I did have an old friend but after the election he did this 180 transformation into a zealot and I couldn't stand his talking points rants any more.

      My brother moved out to TN a year ago (we're from CA) and described getting one of these racial mass-emails. He complained and was actually shunned at the school he was hired to teach at.

      What's weird to me is that I still think most of these people aren't consciously racist. Yet they seem to be entirely opposed to reflection on the subconscious racism that is still infecting our culture after all these years.

      They think that one is either a racist, that they hate minorities, or they are not. But I think the history of racism has always been very subconscious and irrational. Just because we now agree that racism is wrong as a society, it doesn't mean that all the deeper stuff isn't still there, just waiting to bias someone's opinion. So they end up acting in racist ways without knowing it.
      Reply to this
      1. 7/18/2010 7:18 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Eli, you hit the nail on the head and raised an excellent point that I wish I'd gone into a bit in the post.  I've discussed this before with my African American friends, and it's something that I've been very aware of because I've been a longtime supporter of the Southern Poverty Law Center and get their Intelligence Reports every month, so I've known for the 15 years I've been involved with the SPLC that hate crimes have not only not gone down, but they've gone up, particularly toward Hispanics and undocumented workers, gays, and after the Inauguration of the nation's first black president, African Americans--and that is that, once Civil Rights became the law of the land and schools were integrated and blacks began to make headway in the workplace, upscale suburban neighborhoods, and even in movies and on television programs, many people in this country felt as if the issue was somehow no longer a problem.  This was particularly true after President Obama was elected with such a large percentage of white voters, especially in states like Iowa.

        But undercover investigations by people such as "60 Minutes" by producers wearing hidden cameras told a different story.  They'd send a white and a black person with identical resumes in for job interviews, or in to apply for vacant apartments, or whatever, and inevitably, the white person would get the nod.  Or, they would use telephone solicitations--one African American with a very "white" type of accent and a name like "Karen" and one with a more street-accent and a name like, "Kaneesha,"--and again, the same results. 

        The upshot of it was that prejudice had gone underground.  The very people who claimed they were not racist were the ones who automatically favored whites over blacks in just about every instance in which their qualifications were otherwise identical.

        Certainly we ALL have some kind of prejudice in us toward someone or something--even within the black community, this is so--but what I wanted to highlight in this piece was the HYPOCRISY of INSISTING that there was no racism in your ranks--and then going home and circulating racist jokes to everybody on your e-mail list.

        I had not seen any op-edder or blogger or television news correspondent bring up the viral e-mail in their coverage of this problem.  They'd pretty much interview someone from the NAACP and someone from the Tea Party and let it go at that, maybe show some footage from a rally.  But the Tea Partiers were getting away with saying that LIBERALS were "planting" the racist signs at their rallies to make them look bad.

        Their e-mails say differently.
        Reply to this
    • 7/18/2010 7:48 PM Juanita wrote:
      Do you write editorials for newspapers? I think I saw you mention that you were in TX on one of your earlier commentaries. I would like to see your blog in the Belton Journal (Belton, TX) a small weekly newspaper.
      How does that work, do you approach them or do they approach you? I would be happy to suggest your blog to the newspaper if that would help or if you are interested. I enjoy your blog very much and think there are many other that would, too. It would be a different perspective for the Belton Journal.
      Reply to this
      1. 7/19/2010 2:33 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Thank you so much for the lovely compliment, Juanita! 

        Actually, from 1984 until 2000 I did write a local newspaper column called "Country Life" about raising kids in the country, but I also talked about topical things sometimes.  I live in West Texas, in a very rural area, and it is EXTREMELY conservative.  Well, one week I e-mailed in my column about gays, how they weren't pedophiles, how they were basically people too, and how my friends, Scott and Steve, were in a committed relationship that had lasted many years--far more than many heterosexual marriages I knew of.

        Nobody said a word about it, and it was published as usual on a Sunday, and then, on Tuesday, I received a two -sentence letter from my publisher, firing me.  All he said for my efforts of writing for that paper for 16 years was "Thank you for your promptness."  (I had never missed a deadline.)  I had also never charged more than $15 a column, even after my books started to be published by major New York houses and internationally, as well.  My column had been a labor of love.

        He didn't even give me the opportunity to say good-bye to my readers.  I was afraid they would think I'd just gotten too busy for them, and I didn't want to write a Letter to the Editor that would sound like a disgruntled employee, so I was very grateful when a friend of mine wrote a letter explaining what had happened to me, and they did publish that--I expect because my EDITOR had not wanted to see me fired--but then, he didn't own the paper.

        My guess is that the man went to church that Sunday and someone gave him a hard time about the column, and so he fired me.  If he'd had any problem with it before then, he could have pulled the column before it was printed, since I always submitted them days in advance of the Friday deadline.

        But during my years with the local paper, I did attempt many times to get my columns syndicated by sending clippings to other newspapers in Texas, but with no luck.  I tried to interest one or two of my literary agents in it, but they said syndications were cutting their offerings and I had very little chance unless my books hit the bestseller list, which they never did.  And I haven't had a book out, now, in several years.

        During the presidential campaign of 2008, I tried submitting Letters to the Editor of various newspapers  but was told that their policy was that you had to have a local address in order to be published in a given newspaper, and I suspect that might be true of blogs for local papers as well, although I don't know.  I haven't tried.

        Belton's pretty conservative too, isn't it?  They might not want a "different perspective." <ggg>
        Reply to this
    • 7/20/2010 3:49 PM Booth McKeown wrote:
      I had toyed with the idea of responding to this offering, as it struck home in many ways, but didn't feel I had anything new to offer. Then today I started following the story of Shirley Sherrod, the African-American USDA official in Georgia who was forced to resign.

      Ms. Sherrod told my own story in many ways. I grew up in Florida and Georgia. I am a white male in my 50s. We watched the Selma-to-Montgomery march not as a national news story but on our local TV stations. I have been to a George Wallace political rally and I have shook hands with Lester Maddox. I have used the "N" word and told tasteless, cruel but "harmless" ethnic jokes more times than I can count.

      My own views on racial equality have evolved over the years. I was not born with them, nor did I learn them from my family and friends. Certainly racism did (and does) exist among blacks, just as much as it does among whites, albeit blacks have a much better reason.

      What Shirley Sherrod did was publicly explain her evolution from a racist to a person who does not judge on skin color. A part of her speech, the part where she explained her racist past, was lifted and put on the internet and CNN for the world to see, along with the accusation that she was a bigot.

      What has happened to Shirley Sherrod is JUST PLAIN WRONG. She should not be fired, but should be applauded for facing and overcoming her past.

      Along with millions of others, I wept as I watched Obama as he spoke that November night in 1008. I held my brath until January 20th, in mortal fear that some right-wing jihad would take him out before he could actually take the oath of office.

      I have accepted his decision not to close Guantanamo and not to release the pictures from Abu Ghraib (sp?). I have accepted that he's trying to wind down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan responsibly. I have accepted a health care bill that, though it's a great improvement, is not nearly as good as it could have been. Same with financial reform -- at least they are steps in the right direction.

      I will not say my support of the President has waned, but the decision regarding Shirley Sherrod is, as I said, JUST PLAIN WRONG. After I post this, I intend to write to President Obama, Secretary Vilsak, my senators, and anyone else who will listen and tell them the same thing.

      This resignation/firing is a direct result of the racist elements in this country finding a voice in organizations like the Tea Party. I feel like I'm watching a second resurgence of the Klan, and it scares the hell out of me.
      Reply to this
      1. 7/20/2010 5:30 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Thank you so much, my friend, for a sincere and heartfelt and thoughtful comment.  I think we've all had instances in our past where we've revealed prejudices we didn't know we had--I know I've written about my own before, and as I've said many times, I was NOT very happy with the OJ verdict. <g>

        But your story of your evolution to a tolerant viewpoint is a powerful and important one and one I think many people, particularly people in the South, share. 

        I, too, was very disturbed by what happened to Ms. Sherrod.  And had it not been for the CNN reporter who gave the issue an entire half-hour on the air this morning, I don't know that I ever would have heard the REAL story, how the parts cut-and-pasted from her speech were from its beginning, how as the speech progressed, she said she realized that the farmer she was trying to help was not getting any help from the white attorney she'd set up for him, "And I realized it was not a problem of RACE, but a problem of POVERTY," and how she worked very hard to help save his farm--and she did.  The farmer's wife phoned in to CNN and reported that Ms. Sherrod had indeed saved their farm and that her treatment was most unfair because THEY had no problem with the work she had done for them.

        This is typical Glenn Beck--slice and dice and heavily edit segments so he can "GOTCHA!" someone he perceives has wronged him or one of his ideas--in this case, he was clearly offended by the NAACP's call-out and was determined to make them look JUST AS BAD.

        I agree that it was wrong to fire her, summarily, without so much as hearing, before even the full story had been out, and sounds like the hand of Rahm Emmanuel in the background.  I suspect the White House is trying to ward off a tit-for-tat firestorm of accusations and counter-accusations of racism and reverse racism in political circles with this terribly, terribly important election coming up.

        Governors elected this year, you see, will be responsible for overseeing the redistricting in all the states--which has POWERFUL political consequences, as we saw here in Texas when Tom DeLay rammed through redistricting in our state, causing state Dem reps to leave, but garnering the Republicans six more congresspeople to join the Rubber-Stamp Brigade that caused the abysmal state the country is in now.  Keep in mind that a Republican governor looked the other way when there were CLEAR signs of corruption in the vote-count in Ohio in 2004, which swung the election to Bush, and we all know who was governor of Florida in 2000.

        If the president loses the House and/or the Senate, it could shut down not only any attempt he may make to get anything new done--like an energy bill--but could foul up the works with all kinds of nonsense investigations and possibly another bogus impeachment battle--this is how extreme the Republicans are.  Not to mention, their avowed determination to repeal health care reform and Wall Street reform.  If they can shut him down, stop him, they can possibly get rid of him in 2012, and bring back the K Street party!!!

        So for the rest of the summer to be tied up in yet another tiresome back-and-forth right-and-left battle on race would be a distraction the Democrats on ballots do not need right now, and I'm afraid poor Ms. Sherrod became the sacrificial lamb to that.  But what pisses me off is the apparent power Glenn Beck has to get people fired in this administration (always people of color, I might add)--just by whipping up another fake controversy and phony outrage with his cut-and-paste methods.  THAT really pisses me off.
        Reply to this
        1. 11/10/2010 10:46 AM Medical Alert wrote:
          I appreciate your analysis of the combination of forces that led to the shameful Sherrod Affair. Thanks for putting it in perspective for me. (Thanks, too, for protesting it to all your representatives.)
          P.S. Glenn Beck's irresponsible reporting and yet dramatic power ticks me off, too.

          What's next?
          Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.